In part one, we looked at the events of the first week of General Conference, the conservative advances that were being made, and the secret meeting that brought the church to the point of asking the Council of Bishops to intervene. Today we will examine what the Conference did with the proposal and what it might ultimately mean for the future of United Methodism.
On the day the Conference was expected to vote on issues of sexuality, and seemed poised to strengthen the Biblical interpretation, the bishops instead offered a new proposal to delegates. It would set aside debate on sexual matters, form a commission to study the issue, and return in two or three years to a special General Conference to finally vote. After an incredibly confusing debate, this ultimately passed with a 23 vote majority, 428 for and 405 against. There were several questionable parliamentary maneuvers that kept that vote in place for the remainder of the conference. If you want the nuts and bolts synopsis of this process, here is a play by play. The end result was that all the hard work from the previous week ironically served to build the pressure that ultimately led to the creation of the bishops’ commission. The truth is that there is no way a negotiated settlement could have been worked out at General Conference, so a commission is really the only way we could move toward a permanent resolution of our division. If handled with integrity, the depth of our division will be clear, and steps can be taken to move us either back to a covenant-based unity or an amicable separation. If the Council of Bishops does not deal in good faith with the more conservative commission members, there will be major opposition from what has become the evangelical majority of the UMC.
Some Good News
During that second week of Conference, there were some very positive petitions that passed which did not deal with questions of sexuality. There was good news on the pro-life position, accountability for bishops, our relationship with Israel, women’s ministry, and changes for dealing with petitions in future General Conferences. For more detail on those positive developments, click here.
In the meantime, those who view changing the Book of Discipline as a justice issue continue to press their case. Since 2012, charges, trials and accountability have been in short supply. Some bishops have chosen to quietly resolve these issues under the cloak of secrecy and “just resolutions.” We have even had a retired UM Bishop perform two “gay marriages” with absolutely no repercussions. Some of the more radical bishops have been quietly moving conservatives out of their
pulpits and replacing them with younger, more theologically compatible clergy. At least four annual conferences have signaled that sexual preference will have no bearing in the ordination of pastors in their areas. Many pastors are now “outing” themselves and thousands of others have signaled they are in solidarity with them in an attempt to put pressure on the church. Groups like “Love Prevails” and RMN (Reconciling Ministries Network) are calling for more disruption and chaos in the future. There are even rumors that at least one of our Jurisdictional Conferences may elect and consecrate a bishop who is gay. I predict these acts of rebellion will only escalate with the tacit approval of a conflicted Council of Bishops.
[callout]We’re a united church in the same sense that two cats tied together at the tail are united.[/callout]
What this all ultimately means is that the UMC is standing on the verge of something new. It is clear that the present course cannot be maintained. The conservative/progressive battle has created a crisis of identity. There are some who said we left Portland a united church. That’s true in the same sense that two cats tied together at the tail are united. The string that holds us together has grown perilously thin. We live together in the same house, but share little in common. In the end, this conflict is not about sexuality. That is merely the symptom of far more foundational differences in this broken church. We have different understandings of biblical truth, different beliefs about Christology, conflicting convictions of morality, and opposing views of mission and ministry. IT’S TIME to set one another free to pursue these very different roads.
There’s no way around it, it’s going to get messy. So what can the local churches do as all this works itself out?
- Be a lighthouse in your community. The world is deeply longing for the truth of the gospel. The local church has always been the best way to touch individual lives, and ultimately build the Kingdom of God. The fields are ripe; get to harvesting!
- Pray hard. There is a movement to pray for our UMC every Monday between now and the called General Conference. Search for “Pray UMC” on Facebook for a weekly guide to prayer. Meet with others each Monday and ask God to help us navigate these uncharted waters.
- Don’t run away. That is the first inclination when this level of conflict confronts us. I suspect that part of the strategy of the left is to act out in such outrageous ways that it will provoke those who are more conservative to leave. But I firmly believe there is going to be a strong, conservative, biblical Methodist fellowship that will spring from the ashes. Hang in there and see what God has planned for the future.
- Press for accountability. If you are in a conference where the Board of Ministry is opening the doors for the ordination of LGBTQIA persons, flood the bishop’s inbox with mail. Demand that the Book of Discipline be followed. Shine the light on the acts of rebellion. If pastors do not refrain from performing these same-sex marriages, file charges and push the bishops to deal with the issue. Make some noise. Some believe the bishops’ letter signaled a cessation of enforcement of our BOD with no charges or trials on LGBTQIA matters for at least two years. That moratorium comes as over 100 clergy taunt the church with revelations of their homosexual relationships. That should be unacceptable to the ones who pay the salaries of these bishops. I overheard one pastor in Portland say, “No charges, no trials, no accountability …no apportionments.” I’m not saying you should do that, but it might be a measure of last resort. After all, covenant is a two-way street.
- Inform others. The truth is that many of our laity have no idea how serious this division is. The silence has allowed the cancer to grow in the darkness. Don’t just tell them about the problems, but tell them there is hope for a new Methodism on the horizon. We will once again faithfully stand for the truth of God’s Word and call the world to holiness.
A Hope and a Future
I left Portland with more hope than I’ve had after any previous conference. I believe that after more than 40 years of fighting the same battles, the tide has turned, and that we will hold fast to the biblical principles and covenant that John Wesley established over 2 centuries ago. There is much hard work ahead of us, but we owe it to the generations that follow to stand for biblical truth until the end. I’m still standing. Will you join me?
7 thoughts on “What really happened at General Conference? – Part 2”
Good piece, Wes. We are many. Even though our 7 years in Africa was not invested in African Methodists (Africa Gospel Church, an indigenous denomination, instead) my heart is “greatly warmed” by the witness of our African Methodist brothers and sisters.
Excellent analysis Wes!
I’m wondering when the church is going to split over ‘gluttony.’ There is no question at all in the bible whether that is something that separates us from God. …our fat waist, our fat pocket books, our fat houses, our fat vehicles, our fat pride…
Forgive us Father, we know not what we do.
Would someone help me get this log out of my eye!
Last I checked no one was marching at General Conference demanding that gluttony, greed, pride, adultery, etc. be celebrated an no longer called sin. God calls us to obey His Word, not change its meaning to adapt to culture. He loves us as we are and loves us too much to leave us there.
We have already changed the meaning of scripture to adapt to culture. I don’t think its the strategy of the left to act out in protest in order to encourage a split. A lot of what people were saying is that they loved the methodist tradition and wanted to stay in the church. Otherwise they could have just abandoned it and went to another denomination that is more inclusive. Jesus was always on the side of those marginalized in society, the poor, the tax collectors, the prostitutes, the samaritans etc etc etc… He challenged the religious leaders of the day and exposed their hypocrisy. He demonstrated extravagent love and welcome. Do you really want to build a church whose primary reason of splitting is excluding homosexuals from ordination and marriage? Can you not worship in the same space as someone who has differing fews then you? I think its a sign of spiritual maturity that we have hard conversations with each other and love one another in all the rich diversity that makes up the church. Please don’t compare their activism with cancer.
I didn’t say they were doing these acts of rebellion in order to precipitate schism. I said they were doing it to drive conservative evangelicals away. They don’t want the church to split, they just want the church.
It is true that Jesus reached out to the marginalized, but when confronted with sinful behavior He didn’t bless it. He forgave and said, “go and sin no more”. His Church can do no less.
I don’t believe there is anyone in this debate who truly desires schism. It can be avoided if those in rebellion will stop breaking covenant and return to live under the same Book of Discipline everyone else is living under. The LGBTQIA issues are only the symptom of much deeper areas of division. There are none of us who can not worship with them. They have always been welcome in our churches. But like all other sinners they will hear the call to repent and believe the Gospel. They can worship with us, but they can not stand in our pulpits and preach a Gospel they do not believe or follow. They can worship with us, but they can not ask the church to bless their unholy unions. The current stand of the UMC that the person is valued but the behavior is contrary to church teaching (sin) is correct and unlikely to change.
We talk more about our Book of Discipline than we do about the Bible. That is where the answers are and they are very explicit. Our nation has a weak congress, our denomination has weak leadership. I make that correlation to show how worldly we have become. This should never have ever been an issue. If this group of people does not want to change, they should go to a liberal denomination, not insist because they like being Methodist, they change the way the denomination believes. It’s like suing someone for not baking a cake for same sex marriage. They choose to cause trouble rather than go where there would be no problem. The very fact that this issue has broken families, a country, and churches show it is wrong. I visualize Jesus with tears streaming down His face and Satan dancing a jig of victory. The good news is that is not how it ends. Praise God!